Monday, September 26, 2005
Oh Dr. Oatmeal. Here are today's Quaker noats.Try to follow the logic. It's like a maze.
1. Fire's moral purpose is to provide warmth and light.
2. Sex's moral purpose is to provide procreation and unification.
3. Is it morally wrong to use fire for just light?
4. Is it morally wrong to use sex for just unification?
Ok, I'm not sure if this is just a poor example of a professor trying to get me to think, or if there is a less-than-subliminal message here. Is she justifying sex without the possibility of procreation? And if she is...why?!? I about lost it when I saw that.
Too distracted right now to post anything more...look for more later, though.
Caritas et veritas.
1. Fire's moral purpose is to provide warmth and light.
2. Sex's moral purpose is to provide procreation and unification.
3. Is it morally wrong to use fire for just light?
4. Is it morally wrong to use sex for just unification?
Ok, I'm not sure if this is just a poor example of a professor trying to get me to think, or if there is a less-than-subliminal message here. Is she justifying sex without the possibility of procreation? And if she is...why?!? I about lost it when I saw that.
Too distracted right now to post anything more...look for more later, though.
Caritas et veritas.
